Tag: ETO

  • Distinctions Between Discrete and Process Manufacturing

     

    Process manufacturingProcess manufacturing is different, distinct, and distinguishable from discrete manufacturing. Process manufacturing uses formulations versus discrete manufacturers use Bills of Materials (BOMs) and assembles along a routing. Process manufacturers blend a batch – often a literal recipe found in food and beverage manufacturing.

    Discrete manufacturers are typically ETO (engineer-to-order), which includes make-to-stock (MTS), make-to-order (MTO), and assemble-to-order (ATO) production facilities.  Because each product manufacturer is unique, often requiring on-going modifications and engineering during the manufacturing process, there is a strong requirement for synchronized planning, scheduling, execution management and tracking capabilities. Without this alignment and monitoring, operations may degrade and erode profitability.

    Assembly is the cornerstone of discrete manufacturing; it is an exact and precision-focused process. Products are most commonly manufactured in individual production sequence and size, scope, and materials vary widely. In discrete manufacturing production, orders and products change frequently from order to order.

    Process manufacturers build something that cannot be taken apart; once the cake batter ingredients have been mixed, the ingredients cannot be removed from the finished goods produced. This makes process manufacturers formula-focused.

    discrete manufacturingDiscrete manufacturers make finished goods that have components that can be taken apart and used in another capacity. Discrete manufacturing can be reversed, while process manufacturing is irreversible.

    Discrete manufacturing uses complex, layered BOMs while process manufacturing uses multiple recipes and formulas. Process manufacturing looks at shelf life and lot potency. Shelf Life is defined by the Department of Defense (DoD) Shelf Life Management Manual:

    “The total period of time beginning with the date of manufacture, date of cure (for elastomeric and rubber products only), date of assembly, or date of pack (subsistence only), and terminated by the date by which an item must be used (expiration date) or subjected to inspection, test, restoration, or disposal action; or after inspection/laboratory test/restorative action that an item may remain in the combined wholesale (including manufacture’s) and retail storage systems and still be suitable for issue or use by the end user.”

    Discrete manufacturing values serial numbers, assembles, and ECNs. An engineering change notice (ECN), or change notice, is a document which records or authorizes a change to a specific design. Following sound engineering principles, control and documentation are necessary to ensure that changes are built upon a known foundation and approved by relevant authorities.

    An ECN must contain identification of what needs to be changed. This should include the part number and name of the component and reference the drawings that show the component in detail or assembly.

    It must also include the reason(s) for the change as well as a description of the change. This includes a drawing of the component before and after the change. Generally, these drawings only reflect the detail affected by the change.

    ECN’s unique to discrete manufacturers list documents and departments affected by the change. The most important part of making a change is ensuring that all pertinent groups are notified and all documents updated.

    Process manufacturing has the production characteristic which includes few or minimal interruptions in processing within one production run, or between production runs of similar products.

    Discrete engineered-to-order manufacturing includes a high level of customer participation in the design and manufacturing process of the product. Multiple stakeholders and participants work together to make a complex product.  Commonly there are challenges, difficulties, and changes as the product is being manufactured. A troublesome problem in the design phase, often translates to a damaging setback in the manufacturing phase.

    Engineered-to-order mandates that production information and specifications are constantly moving between the ETO company and the customer. Product data including design specifications, requirement files, and engineering changes are as fast as a great racquetball game. Confusion ensues without a clear, concise exchange of product information. The result of failing communication in the ETO discrete space is the thin margin between a profitable or unprofitable project.

    ETO manufacturing types

    Process industries make products in bulk quantities, such as pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and paints. Discrete manufacturers produce or assemble component or finished products recognized by serial numbers or labeling products and assessable as numerical quantities rather than by weight or volume.

    Do you have any other distinctions you think we should add? If so, drop us a comment!

    Supply Chain Brief Best Article

  • Creating Trust Throughout the Supply Chain Using Demand-Driven Methods

    Creating Trust Throughout the Supply Chain Using Demand-Driven Methods

    supply chain collaborationHow reducing forecasting errors and disruption risks create better supplier relationships. 

    Building trust in the supply chain is essential to driving flow; and when there are forecast errors, there is an inherent mistrust throughout the supply chain. Lack of collaboration is often the cornerstone of conflict, blame, and mistrust between a manufacturer and suppliers.  Missed shipments tend to lead to finger-pointing, followed by over-buffering on both sides to guard against further disruptions, which often results in further exacerbation of the negative bull-whip effect.

    Cost-effective supply chain collaboration between manufacturer and suppliers is paramount. Without that constraint addressed, all other benefits are pointless.

    Start with right-sizing inventory and just-in-time replenishment practices.

    In a recent issue of Financial Director, editorial contributors Paul Dennis and Peter Young, suggested if there is one thing about predicting the future that always comes true, it’s that everyone, from time to time, gets things wrong. It is safe to say that with forecasts, they can be relatively accurate at a high level (i.e. total sales, sales for product type, etc), but at a low level like sales for an individual for the week 40 is near impossible.  However, this is where the relationship between manufacturer and suppliers exists.  The article argues that what separates best-in-class companies ekanban softwarefrom those that struggle with accuracy is how they root out (and learn from) forecasting errors.

    From an inventory perspective, today more manufacturers are viewing excessive inventory as a huge financial liability rather than an asset. Best-in-class demand-driven manufacturers successfully combat this risk through “right-sizing” inventory and stock buffers using pull-based or demand-driven replenishment solutions.  This methodology greatly reduces reliance on forecast and therefore reduces the impact of forecast error.  A common and highly effective way to implement a demand-driven methodology is through an electronic Kanban system.

    In leveraging an eKanban system, manufacturers and supply chain professionals start driving good replenishment signals to the supplier, fostering trust and reducing noise.  eKanban systems automate inventory replenishment by sending suppliers real-time demand signals and enable collaboration by providing both parties with online visibility into order and fulfillment status.  How does real-time collaboration and visibility impact the financial statements and key performance indicators?  Case in point: In their first year on an eKanban system, plastics manufacturer, Dynisco, saved over $985,000.00 in inventory costs, just by right-sizing.  (See article in Plant Services magazine.)

    Create a collaborative, transparent environment for all suppliers.

    From Superstorms to Factory Fires: Managing Unpredictable Supply Chain Disruptions,” was a feature article published in Harvard Business Review by David Simchi-Levi, William Schmidt, and Yehua Wei. They suggested that leaders using traditional risk-management techniques and simple heuristics (dollar amount spent at a site, for instance) often end up focusing exclusively on the so-called strategic suppliers for whom expenditures are very high and whose parts are deemed crucial to product differentiation, and overlooking the risks associated with low-cost, commodity suppliers. The fact is, a lack of collaboration with any supplier introduces an element of risk including disruptions to flow that impact throughput. And, a lack of visibility across the supply chain network results in managers taking the wrong actions, wasting resources, and leaving the organization exposed to hidden risk. Demand or Pull-based manufacturing is a method that allows companies to identify, manage, and reduce exposure to supply chain risks by creating transparency.

    We define Pull-based or Demand-Driven Manufacturing as a method of manufacturing where production is based on actual customer demand rather than a forecast – and where all layers of manufacturing are synchronized (people, process, materials, machines, and information) to drive flow. This process is accelerated by technology that automates, digitizes data and connects every function within the demand-driven organization to every layer of the supply chain. Gartner estimates that 90% of manufacturers who are not truly demand-driven, want to be. This is likely due to the many benefits demand-driven manufacturing offers, including greater customer – and supplier – satisfaction.

    Environments for Demand-Driven Manufacturing

    Demand-driven principles can be used in nearly every manufacturing environment because the focus is on flow through the factory. In make-to-stock (MTS) environments, a demand-driven manufacturing platform can drive immediate improvements by right-sizing inventory, increasing flow and throughput, and replenishing resources using an eKanban system. These improvements can be extended across the entire supply chain. In make-to-order (MTO), engineer-to-order (ETO), and configure-to-order (CTO) environments, a synchronized demand-driven manufacturing planning, scheduling, and execution approach manages constraints to deliver increased flow, throughput, on-time delivery, and clarity throughout the manufacturing process and the extended supply chain.

    In any environment, the aim of a demand-driven system is to synchronize all layers of manufacturing to drive flow. Order statuses (and any associated disruptions) are visible throughout the enterprise – to the production team, supply chain management, customer service, sales, leadership – and suppliers. Everyone is working from the same factual, real-time information. Trust is built from a single version of the truth gained through shared visibility and collaboration.

     

     

    Additional resources:

    White Paper: Gaining Confidence: Syncing Supplier Delivery to Customer Demand

    Article: What is Demand-Driven Manufacturing?

    Case Study: Continuous Improvement Immersion + the Right Tools Proves Profitable for Dynisco

    Supply Chain Brief Best Article

  • Demand Driven Manufacturing in the Engineer-to-Order Space

    Demand Driven Manufacturing in the Engineer-to-Order Space

    Aligning Lean Manufacturing and Continuous Improvement Practices

    ETO manufacturing

    Demand-driven manufacturing (DDM) is an approach to manufacturing where production is based on actual demand rather than forecasts. DDM enables a synchronized, closed loop between customer orders, production scheduling and manufacturing execution – all while simultaneously coordinating the flow of materials and resources across the supply chain. The terms Pull-based manufacturing and Just-in-Time (JIT) manufacturing are also used within the context of DDM and the flow of materials.

    Synchronizing engineering and manufacturing

    Engineer-to-Order (ETO) product designers attempt to provide “mass customization” of unique, one-of-a-kind products better, faster, and cheaper than competitors. DDM methods and systems allow for many or all portions of the ETO process to be automated, providing quicker turnaround, lower engineering costs, and consistent adherence to product rules and standards. Extending Demand/Pull automation capabilities beyond manufacturing to the engineering group, ensures that they are in alignment with manufacturing production, and ultimately, customer needs. We’ve found that engineering groups who are engaged in this way realize significant increases in Engineering throughput.

    ETO, along with MTO (made-to-order), CTO (configure-to-order) and MTS (make-to-stock) environments can improve production flow and throughput (profitability) through synchronization (people, process, machines, materials and data) enabled using demand-driven manufacturing methodologies.

    Process automation and big data

    Synchronization of data improves processes, production flow and visibility. The practice of analyzing, documenting, optimizing, and automating manufacturing processes starts by evaluating value-added tasks.  Well-developed DDM systems create a seamless link from initial client contact throughout the supply chain to customer delivery. Automation of these processes improves the accuracy of the information transferred and ensures the repeatability of the value added tasks performed.Engineer-to-order (ETO) enterprises

    In addition to automation, effective ETO technology solutions drive engineering innovation. Data integration and aggregation with machines and systems across the enterprise provides insight to develop new features and additional product offerings. Instant visibility into design requirements, compliance, quality, process and machine data through a single window not only empowers engineering with essential product development knowledge and lessons learned, but provides an information platform from which they can direct continuous improvement efforts.

    Connecting and communicating through a demand-driven ecosystem

    ETO manufacturers invest in demand-driven methods based on (among other things) the value of significantly reducing lead times, engineering and manufacturing cycle times, and product rework while improving customer service, internal communication, capacity and throughput. There is additional value to the clients of ETO manufacturers when their product is of high quality, designed precisely to their requirements and delivered on time and within budget. As such, demand-driven technologies for the ETO market extend value when they create a single version of the truth through an ecosystem that connects sales/customer service, engineering, operations and the shop floor with the same, real-time information.

    With nearly 60% of ETO sales now based globally, the ability to operate in a web-based data-driven environment becomes more critical. ETO manufacturers build unique products designed to customer demand (specifications). Each product requires a unique set of item numbers, bills of material, and routings. Estimates and quotations are required to win business.

    Unlike standard products, the customer is heavily involved throughout the entire design and manufacturing process. Engineering changes are typical and material is not purchased for inventory, but for a specific project. All actual costs are allocated to a project and tracked against the original estimate. Once complete, the product is typically installed at the customer’s site. In most cases, aftermarket services continue throughout the life of the product. And while it sounds onerous, these one-of-a-kind manufacturers are thriving because they recognize the value (and growing market opportunity) in implementing manufacturing solutions based on actual customer demand. Case studies demonstrate that margins are better when proven, demand-driven solutions geared for discrete manufacturers are implemented.

    If you work in an ETO environment, I’d welcome your comments and thoughts around demand-driven and Lean practices.

     

    Recommended reading:

    White Paper: Why Become More Demand-Driven? Responding to Customer Needs

    Article: What is Demand-Driven Manufacturing?

    Webpage: Lean Manufacturing and Demand-Driven Value

    Supply Chain Brief Best Article

“test”

manufacturing software

White Paper - The Next Generation of Planning and Scheduling Solutions

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

×

manufacturing software

×

manufacturing software

White Paper | Gaining Clarity

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

×
Test_form

manufacturing software

×
White Paper | Gaining Confidence

manufacturing software

White Paper | Gaining Confidence

Please complete and submit the following information to download the white paper. Thank you for your interest in Synchrono!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

×